How quickly can you verify a deepfake video during an active election?

For clients with an active election monitoring engagement, our rapid-response protocol targets triage delivery within 1 to 2 hours of flagging and full forensic report delivery within 6 to 12 hours for standard cases. For critical incidents in the 48 hours before polling, we operate an accelerated protocol — contact us to discuss SLAs for your specific election engagement.

Do you cover regional language content in Indian elections?

Yes. Our monitoring and analysis capabilities cover content in Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Bengali, Marathi, Gujarati, Punjabi, and Odia, among other Indian languages. Regional language audio and video are analyzed using the same forensic methodology as English-language content — linguistic content is not the primary object of analysis; the technical signals of synthetic media generation are.

Can your forensic reports be used to file complaints with the Election Commission?

Yes. Our forensic incident reports are structured to support complaint filing with the Election Commission of India under the Model Code of Conduct and relevant provisions of the Representation of the People Act. We can assist clients in preparing the technical sections of formal complaints.

What platforms do you monitor?

Our monitoring covers public content on X (Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and public Telegram channels. WhatsApp monitoring relies on forwarded content submitted to us directly, as WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption does not permit platform-level monitoring. We also monitor broadcast news clips submitted by clients or identified through our media tracking systems.

Can this service be used outside of formal election periods?

Yes. Political disinformation using synthetic media is not limited to formal election campaigns. We offer year-round monitoring for political organisations, government bodies, and media organisations that face continuous disinformation threats — structured as an ongoing retainer rather than an election-cycle engagement.

Voice Clone Detection

Identify AI-synthesized and cloned audio with forensic precision.

WHY THIS MATTERS

A CLONED VOICE IS INDISTINGUISHABLE TO THE HUMAN EAR. IT IS NOT INDISTINGUISHABLE TO FORENSIC ANALYSIS.

Voice cloning technology has reached a level where a credible imitation of any person's voice can be generated from as little as a few seconds of reference audio. The resulting synthetic voice passes casual listener scrutiny and, in many cases, passes sophisticated phone-based authentication systems. In India, voice-cloned audio is being used to impersonate bank executives and authorize fraudulent transfers, to fabricate statements attributed to political figures and distribute them on WhatsApp before elections, to create false evidence in employment and family disputes, and to bypass voice-biometric security systems. Acoustic forensic analysis detects the machine behind the voice - not through listening, but through the physics of how synthetic speech is generated and the mathematical traces it leaves in the audio signal.

service details

What This Service Includes

Everything you receive at the conclusion of a voice clone detection engagement.

FORENSIC AUDIO REPORT (PDF, SIGNED)

Structured court-ready PDF with executive summary, methodology disclosure, confidence score, and findings - signed by the forensic analyst.

WAVEFORM & SPECTROGRAM VISUALIZATIONS

Annotated waveform and spectrogram outputs showing the acoustic anomalies detected, designed to be presentable as visual evidence in legal proceedings.

ACOUSTIC ANOMALY MAPPING

Mapping of detected acoustic anomalies across the audio timeline - identifying the specific regions of the recording where synthetic speech indicators are strongest.

Our process

FROM SUBMISSION TO FORENSIC FINDING - A STRUCTURED, DOCUMENTED PROCESS.

Acoustic forensic analysis built for legal scrutiny.

WHO WE SERVE

BUILT FOR THE INSTITUTIONS THAT NEED FORENSIC CERTAINTY.

Not a probability score. A defensible forensic finding.

BFSI & FINTECH

Investigate fraudulent voice-authorized transactions. Verify recorded customer instructions. Authenticate call center recordings submitted as evidence.

LAW ENFORCEMENT

Authenticate voice evidence in criminal investigations. Detect fabricated confessions, threats, or instructions in audio evidence.

CORPORATE SECURITY

Detect executive voice impersonation in internal communications, video calls, and recorded instructions.

LEGAL COUNSEL

Commission independent forensic reports on voice evidence submitted in civil or criminal matters.

POLITICAL PARTIES & ELECTION BODIES

Authenticate audio attributed to political figures before official response or regulatory escalation.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about voice clone detection

Hear what our clients say about our IT and security solutions

Can voice clone detection work on WhatsApp audio and phone call recordings?

Yes. Our acoustic forensic methodology is specifically calibrated for compressed, low-bitrate audio typical of WhatsApp voice notes and phone call recordings. Compression affects audio quality but leaves characteristic forensic signatures of its own, and our analysis accounts for this. We document the impact of compression on confidence levels in the report.

What if I only have a few seconds of audio?

Short audio clips can still be analyzed, though confidence levels are lower with very short samples. As a general guide, clips over 5 seconds yield useful acoustic data; clips over 15 seconds support high-confidence findings. We will always disclose the impact of clip length on our confidence scoring.

Can you tell whose voice it is, not just whether it is cloned?

Speaker identification - determining the identity of an unknown speaker - is a separate service from voice clone detection. We offer comparative acoustic analysis where a reference voice sample of the alleged speaker is available. We do not perform speculative speaker identification without reference material.

Can voice clone detection be defeated by post-processing?

Post-processing (noise addition, re-encoding, pitch shifting) can reduce the visibility of some synthesis artifacts, but it also introduces its own forensic signatures. Our multi-signal approach analyzes convergent evidence across multiple acoustic dimensions, making it significantly harder to evade than single-signal detection. We document cases where post-processing has been applied.

Is audio from a video call or Zoom recording analyzable?

Yes. Video call recordings in MP4, MOV, or WEBM format are accepted. Our pipeline extracts the audio track and analyzes it independently. Video conferencing compression artifacts are well-characterized in our forensic methodology.

get started

Submit your case. We'll find the truth.

Tell us about your case. We respond with a forensic assessment plan within one business day.

Contact Our Team

Explore all services